Total Equity Capital, LLC v. Flurry, Inc. et al
Total Equity Capital, LLC |
Flurry, Inc. and Simon Khalaf |
1:2015cv04168 |
June 1, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
XX Out of State |
Jesse M. Furman |
Securities/Commodities/Exchanges |
15 U.S.C. ยง 78 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 OPINION AND ORDER re: 14 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Simon Khalaf, Flurry, Inc., 19 LETTER MOTION for Oral Argument addressed to Judge Jesse M. Furman from Joel C. Haims dated December 3, 2015. For the reasons stated above , TEC's claims under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 must be and are dismissed. It follows that its claim for control person liability under Section 20(a) also fails. See, e.g., First Jersey Sec., Inc., 101 F.3d at 1472. That leaves only the questi on of whether TEC should be granted leave to amend its complaint for a second time. TEC does not ask for leave to amend, and the Court declines to grant it sua sponte, both because amendment would likely be futile and because, in granting leave to fi le a first amended complaint, the Court expressly warned that TEC would not be given another opportunity to address the issues raised in Defendants' motion to dismiss. (See Docket No. 11). See, e.g., Clark v. Kitt, No. 12-CV-8061 (CS), 2014 WL 4 054284, at *15 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 15, 2014) (holding that the plaintiff's failure to remedy the complaint's deficiencies identified by an earlier motion to dismiss "is alone sufficient grounds to deny leave to amend"); see also, e.g., Ruotolo v. City of N.Y., 514 F.3d 184, 191 (2d Cir. 2008) (affirming the district court's denial of leave to amend in part because of the previous opportunities that the plaintiff had received to amend the complaint). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 14 and 19 and to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 6/1/2016) (kko) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.