Simpson et al v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al
Lacole Simpson, Sheree Steele and Delbert Sorhaindo |
CVS Pharmacy, Inc., Anthony Salvatore, Abdul Selene, Natia Doe, Amery Attameemy, Uma Doe, Hazan Doe, Happy Doe and John and Jane Does 1 through 50 |
1:2015cv04261 |
June 3, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Kings |
John G. Koeltl |
Employment |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1367 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 239 OPINION AND ORDER re: 178 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Mominna Ansoralli, Zaire Lamarr-Arruz, 191 MOTION Exclude Proposed Expert Opinions and Testimony of David L. Crawford, Ph.D. filed by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. The Court has considered all of the arguments raised by the parties. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the arguments are either moot or without merit. The plaintiffs' motion for certification of a class is denied. CVS's motion to exclude the proposed Crawford testimony is granted. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 9/26/2017) (anc) |
Filing 70 ORDER denying 56 Letter Motion for Discovery. There is no basis to conclude that the ruling of the Magistrate Judge was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Indeed, the order imposed a plainly reasonable restriction on discovery. The objection is overruled. The Clerk is directed to close Dkt. No. 56. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 3/29/2016) (kgo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.