Mount Whitney Investments LLLP v. Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting, LLC et al
| Mount Whitney Investments LLLP |
| Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting, LLC, Manfred Ritter, Thomas Schulte and Stefan Elsterman |
| 1:2015cv04479 |
| June 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Albany |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
ORDER: DISMISSES Plaintiff's action without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate any pending motions and to close the case. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 8/31/2020) (ks)
|
|
Filing
128
ORDER: On April 9, 2019, the parties were directed to provide a status report by April 23, 2019. Doc. 127. Neither party did so. The parties are hereby ORDERED to file a status report by May 1, 2020. Failure to comply with this Order may result in sanctions, including dismissal for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/6/2020) (mro)
|
|
Filing
114
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION re: 71 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. filed by Thomas Schulte, 78 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction filed by Thomas Schulte: For the reasons set forth above, Schulte's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate Schulte as a Defendant, and to terminate the motions, Docs. 71, 78. (Thomas Schulte terminated.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/23/2017) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER re: 58 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Goldman Morgenstern & Partners Consulting, LLC. For the reasons set forth above, Defendant GoMoPa's motion to dismiss is DENIED. The parties are directed to appear for a conference on May 13, 2016, at 12:00 pm. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 58. It is SO ORDERED. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 5/2/2016) (kko)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
