InterDigital Communications, Inc. et al v. Huawei Investment & Holding Co., Ltd. et al
| InterDigital Communications, Inc., InterDigital, Inc., InterDigital Holdings, Inc., InterDigital Technology Corporation, IPR Licensing, Inc., InterDigital Patent Holdings, Inc., DRNC Holdings, Inc., Vid Scale, Inc., PCMS Holdings, Inc., IDPA Holdings, Inc. and IDLR Holdings, Inc. |
| Huawei Investment & Holding Co., Ltd., Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Huawei Device (Dongguan) Co., Ltd., Futurewei Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Huawei Technologies (USA) and Huawei Device USA, Inc. |
| 1:2015cv04485 |
| June 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| John G. Koeltl |
| Arbitration |
| 09 U.S.C. ยง 202 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
OPINION AND ORDER. For the reasons stated above, Huawei's motion to stay this enforcement proceeding is granted, and the motion to confirm the Award is stayed. To the extent not specifically addressed above, the parties' arguments are eithe r moot or without merit. The parties are directed to provide this Court with letter briefs by February 29, 2016, addressing the issue of the amount and type of security. Responsive briefs may be filed by March 4, 2016. The stay is subject to revision should circumstances change. InterDigital can renew its petition for an order confirming the Award after the outcome of the French proceedings is determined. The Clerk is directed to close all pending motions. So ordered. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/17/2016) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
72
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. On February 11, 2016, the parties jointly moved for an order sealing the courtroom during an upcoming oral argument to be held on February 16, 2016. The argument concerns whether an arbitration award should be enforced o r whether the proceeding should be stayed pending a decision of another related proceeding in Paris. The parties' joint request is denied without prejudice to the parties making a particularized showing with respect to any particular information. So ordered. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 2/11/2016) (rjm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
