Fu et al v. Mee May Corp. et al
| Bao Cheng Fu, Guang Li Zhang and Zhong Qi Lin |
| Mee May Corp., Jiang Qing Chen, Kuang Chi Wu, Jane Doe and John Doe |
| 1:2015cv04549 |
| June 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
OPINION AND ORDER re: 65 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Thus, because all of the other factors favor approval of the settlement (as explained in my October 18, 2017 Opinion & Order), I approve the settlement in this matter, as amended on September 25, 20 17 and October 20, 2017. In light of the settlement, the action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. The Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to mark this matter closed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 10/24/2017) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (anc)
|
|
Filing
64
OPINION AND ORDER re: 63 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Given that the parties amended other portions of the settlement agreement to limit the general release, the failure to amend this language appears to be an oversight. Thus, because all of the other fa ctors favor approval of the settlement, I shall give the parties another opportunity to amend the settlement agreement for judicial approval. Accordingly, within 30 days of the date of this Order, the parties are to provide a revised settlement agreement that eliminates the foregoing issue. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 10/18/2017) Copies Transmitted By Chambers. (ras)
|
|
Filing
62
OPINION AND ORDER: The parties reached their proposed settlement prior to the settlement conference that I had scheduled in this matter, and therefore, my knowledge of the underlying facts and the justification for the settlement is limited to counse ls' representations in the letters submitted in support of the settlement. (As further set forth in this Order.) Accordingly, within 30 days of the date of this Order, the parties are to provide the information sought and a revised settlement agreement that eliminates the foregoing issues. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 3/31/2017) Copies Sent By Chambers. (cf)
|
|
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER: This matter is before me on the parties' joint application to approve the parties' settlement (Docket Items 54 & 55). (As further set forth in this Order.) Accordingly, the parties' application to approve the propose d settlement in this matter is denied without prejudice. Any renewed application should address the factors identified by Judge Furman in Wolinsky, the amount of damages claimed by each plaintiff and the basis therefore and an explanation for the allocation of the settlement amount. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman on 11/14/2016) Copies Sent By Chambers (cf)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION AND ORDER re: 17 MOTION to Certify Class filed by Zhong Qi Lin, Bao Cheng Fu, Guang Li Zhang: For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification of the FLSA collective action is D ENIED. The parties are directed to appear before the Court for a status conference on Friday, May 6, 2016, at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom 618 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York, 10007. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Entry 17. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 4/20/2016) (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
