Midwood Junction, LLC v. Puerta Del Sol International Investment, S.A.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Midwood Junction, LLC v. Puerta Del Sol International Investment, S.A.

Midwood Junction, LLC v. Puerta Del Sol International Investment, S.A.

Plaintiff:	Midwood Junction, LLC
Defendant:	Puerta Del Sol International Investment, S.A.
Case Number:	1:2015cv05181
Filed:	July 2, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 4, 2017	Filing 39 ORDER for 36 Report and Recommendations. Having reviewed the Report for clear error, the Court adopts it with one small modification. Under the terms of the Agreement, PDS's third payment was due on December 30, 2014, not December 3, 2014. See Pl.'s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Ex. 1, at 5.1 Accounting for this minor error, but otherwise adopting the well-reasoned Report in its entirety, the Court awards Midwood: (1) $350,000 in breach of contract damag es; (2) prejudgment interest on $175,000 at a rate of 5% per year from June 30, 2014 until the date of judgment; (3) prejudgment interest on $175,000 at a rate of 5% per year from December 30, 2014 until the date of judgment; (4) attorneys' fees in the amount of $28,925; and (5) reimbursement of costs and disbursements in the amount of $6,831.11. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 5/4/2017) (cf)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 4, 2017

Filing 39 ORDER for 36 Report and Recommendations. Having reviewed the Report for clear error, the Court adopts it with one small modification. Under the terms of the Agreement, PDS's third payment was due on December 30, 2014, not December 3, 2014. See Pl.'s Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law Ex. 1, at 5.1 Accounting for this minor error, but otherwise adopting the well-reasoned Report in its entirety, the Court awards Midwood: (1) $350,000 in breach of contract damag es; (2) prejudgment interest on $175,000 at a rate of 5% per year from June 30, 2014 until the date of judgment; (3) prejudgment interest on $175,000 at a rate of 5% per year from December 30, 2014 until the date of judgment; (4) attorneys' fees in the amount of $28,925; and (5) reimbursement of costs and disbursements in the amount of $6,831.11. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 5/4/2017) (cf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Midwood Junction, LLC v. Puerta Del Sol International Investment, S.A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Midwood Junction, LLC
Represented By:	Joel Murray Rubenstein
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Puerta Del Sol International Investment, S.A.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?