Feinberg v. Apple Inc.

Feinberg v. Apple Inc.

Plaintiff:	Herbert Feinberg
Defendant:	Apple Inc.
Case Number:	1:2015cv05198
Filed:	July 2, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Ronnie Abrams
Nature of Suit:	Torts to Land
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 10, 2016	Filing 43 OPINION & ORDER re: 36 MOTION to Dismiss / Notice of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. filed by Apple Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that Feinberg lacks standing to bring this act ion against Apple and that, in any event, his SAC fails to state a claim. Because further amendment would be futile, Apple's motion to dismiss the SAC is granted with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor or Apple and close the case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/10/2016) (cf)
November 24, 2015	Filing 28 OPINION & ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' letter briefing regarding Plaintiff's motion to amend his operative complaint, see Dkt. 22-26, as well as Plaintiff's proposed Second Amended Complaint, Dkt. 22. In light of "the lenient standard under Rule 15(a), which provides leave to amend 'shall be freely given,'" Grochowski v. Phoenix Const., 318 F.3d 80, 86 (2d Cir. 2003) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)), Plaintiff's motion is granted. Plaintiff shall file on the electronic docket (ECF) the proposed Second Amended Complaint, which was attached to his September 16, 2015 letter, on or before December 1, 2015. No further amendments will be permitted. It is further ORDERED that de fendant shall have until January 5, 2016 to file a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint as well as any motion to stay discovery pending the disposition of the motion to dismiss. Any opposition to the motion or motions shall be filed on or before January 19, 2016, and any reply on or before January 26, 2016. (Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2015., Motions due by 1/5/2016., Responses due by 1/19/2016, Replies due by 1/26/2016.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/24/2015) (kl)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 10, 2016

Filing 43 OPINION & ORDER re: 36 MOTION to Dismiss / Notice of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. filed by Apple Inc. For the foregoing reasons, the Court concludes that Feinberg lacks standing to bring this act ion against Apple and that, in any event, his SAC fails to state a claim. Because further amendment would be futile, Apple's motion to dismiss the SAC is granted with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment in favor or Apple and close the case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 8/10/2016) (cf)

November 24, 2015

Filing 28 OPINION & ORDER: The Court is in receipt of the parties' letter briefing regarding Plaintiff's motion to amend his operative complaint, see Dkt. 22-26, as well as Plaintiff's proposed Second Amended Complaint, Dkt. 22. In light of "the lenient standard under Rule 15(a), which provides leave to amend 'shall be freely given,'" Grochowski v. Phoenix Const., 318 F.3d 80, 86 (2d Cir. 2003) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)), Plaintiff's motion is granted. Plaintiff shall file on the electronic docket (ECF) the proposed Second Amended Complaint, which was attached to his September 16, 2015 letter, on or before December 1, 2015. No further amendments will be permitted. It is further ORDERED that de fendant shall have until January 5, 2016 to file a motion to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint as well as any motion to stay discovery pending the disposition of the motion to dismiss. Any opposition to the motion or motions shall be filed on or before January 19, 2016, and any reply on or before January 26, 2016. (Amended Pleadings due by 12/1/2015., Motions due by 1/5/2016., Responses due by 1/19/2016, Replies due by 1/26/2016.) (Signed by Judge Ronnie Abrams on 11/24/2015) (kl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Feinberg v. Apple Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Herbert Feinberg
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Apple Inc.
Represented By:	Gabrielle Frances Levin
Represented By:	Adam H. Offenhartz
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?