Louis v. The City Of New York , et al
| Jean Louis |
| The City Of New York, New York City Sanitation Enforcement Agent Ilva Harrigan, New York City Police Officer Thomas Liampachara, New York City Police Officer John Doe 1 and New York City Police Officer John Doe 2 |
| 1:2015cv05229 |
| July 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
OPINION AND ORDER re: 55 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by New York City Sanitation Enforcement Agent Ilva Harrigan, Carmine Semioli, The City Of New York, Anuedi Rodriguez, New York City Police Officer Thomas Liampachara. For the foregoing reasons, the Court GRANTS Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on all of the federal claims against them and the state law claim for false arrest against the Defendant Officers. This Court declines to retain supplemental juri sdiction over the remainder of the state law claims against Defendants and therefore DISMISSES those claims without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate this motion, Doc. 55, and enter judgment in favor of Defendants. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 2/10/2017) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
