M.E. et al v. New York City Department of Education
| M.E. and T.M. |
| New York City Deparment of Education |
| 1:2015cv05306 |
| July 9, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Bronx |
| Vernon S. Broderick |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
OPINION & ORDER re: 18 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by T.M., M.E., T. M., M. E. For the reasons explained above, Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) the 2012 IEP was inad equate, and (2) the DOE's proposed placement at P010X was insufficient to meet K.E.'s sensory needs. I find that the SRO Decision was thorough and well-reasoned, and I agree with the SRO Decision and do not find that the proposed school p lacement constituted a denial to K.E. of a FAPE. Therefore, Plaintiffs are not entitled to tuition reimbursement for the 2012-2013 school year. Accordingly, Plaintiffs' summary judgment motion is DENIED, and Defendant's cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the open motions at Document 18 and Document 21 and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 1/26/2018) (rj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
