Michael Bright-Asante V. Saks & Company INC., Et al.
| Michael Bright-Asante |
| Saks & Company, Inc., Theo Christ and Local 1102 RWDSU UFCW |
| 1:2015cv05876 |
| July 27, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Albany |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
147
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 146 Memorandum & Opinion. in favor of Saks & Company, Inc., Theo Christ against Michael Bright-Asante. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order date d March 18, 2020, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted; in light of the, the parties requests for oral argument are denied as moot; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 03/19/2020) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt) (Main Document 147 replaced on 3/19/2020) (dt).
|
|
Filing
146
OPINION AND ORDER re: 131 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Saks & Company, Inc., Theo Christ. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. In light of this Order, the parties' reque sts for oral argument are denied as moot. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 131, and to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/18/2020) (kv) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
136
OPINION AND ORDER re: 128 MOTION for Reconsideration of Order of February 12, 2019. filed by Michael Bright-Asante. For the reasons set forth above, as well as those detailed in Defendants' letters, see Docs. 125, 130, Bright-Asante's motion is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 128. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/11/2019) (kv)
|
|
Filing
74
OPINION AND ORDER re: 32 MOTION to Dismiss and/or. MOTION to Compel Arbitration filed by Saks & Company, Inc., Theo Christ, 65 MOTION to Amend/Correct Amended Coplaint filed by Michael Bright-Asante, [5 7] CROSS MOTION for Sanctions filed by Saks & Company, Inc., Theo Christ. For the reasons set forth above, Plaintiff's motion to file a second amended complaint or vacate the Award and Saks' motion for sanctions is DENI ED. Saks' motion to compel arbitration and/or dismiss is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part as follows: Saks' motion to compel arbitration of Plaintiff's breach of contract claim is GRANTED. Saks' motion to compel arbitrat ion of his statutory discrimination claims is GRANTED without prejudice. Saks' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's constructive discharge claim is DENIED. Saks' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's race discrimination and retaliation claims pursuant to the NYCHRL is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 32, 57, 65. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 3/9/2017) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
