Sream Inc. v. Shisha International Inc. et al
| Sream Inc. |
| Shisha International Inc., The Gift Shop Corp, Blue Nile Ltd. and Does 1-10 |
| 1:2015cv05991 |
| July 30, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
ORDER: On July 30, 2015, Sream Inc. brought suit against Shisha International Inc., The Gift Shop Corp, Blue Nile Ltd., and Does 1-10 ( collectively, "Defendants") for trademark infringement and counterfeiting. Doc. 1. On Se ptember 9, 2015, the Clerk issued a certificate of default judgment against defendants The Gift Shop and Does 1-10. Doc. 16. However, on October 5, 2015, the Court granted The Gift Shop Corp., by Mohammad Shoaib, a prose litigant, a thir d extension of time to respond to the complaint. Doc. 25. The Court specified that "no further request for an extension of time to answer will be granted." Id. Since then, none of the Defendants have responded to the complaint, an d Plaintiff has not moved for default judgment. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to provide the Court with a status update by October 22, 2020. Failure to comply with the Court's order could result in sanctions, up to and including dismissal for failure to prosecute under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 10/8/2020) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
