Ramos et al v. City Of New York, et al
| Sarah Ramos, Angel Suarez and William Suarez |
| City of New York, Abdiel Anderson, Jose Marrero, David J. Roberts and John Does |
| 1:2015cv06085 |
| August 3, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
146
OPINION AND ORDER re: 139 MOTION to Appeal Clerk's Decision on Taxation of Costs re: 138 Taxation of Costs filed by William Suarez, Angel Suarez, Sarah Ramos. For the reasons explained above, Plaintiffs' mot ion to appeal the Clerk of Court's taxation of costs is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants, as the prevailing party in this litigation, are awarded $2,146.48 in costs. The $2,146.48 in costs awarded includes both the $20.00 docketing fee under 28 U.S.C. § 1923 and the following costs for the original deposition transcript of each plaintiff and Julio Suarez, plus one copy: Sarah Ramos: $532.44 ($590.04 originally taxed less � 36;57.60 for the word indexes); Angel Suarez: $779.52 ($876.72 originally taxed less $97.20 for the word indexes); William Suarez: $657.92 ($737.12 originally taxed less $79.20 for the word indexes); Julio Su arez: $156.60 ($181.80 originally taxed less $25.20 for the word indexes). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to (1) modify the taxation of costs to conform with the aforementioned figure and (2) to terminate the motion, Doc. 139. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 7/21/2019) (mro) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
|
Filing
91
OPINION AND ORDER re: 87 MOTION for Reconsideration filed by Jose Marrero, City of New York, 89 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 85 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by William Suarez, Angel Suarez, Sarah Ramos: Plaintiffs Sarah Ram os, Angel Suarez, and William Suarez bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and New York State law against the City of New York, Detectives Abdiel Anderson, Jose Marrero, and David J. Roberts, Sergeant Angel Bones, and Police Officer Jon athan Wally (together, "Defendants"). Plaintiffs assert claims for, among other things, unreasonable search and seizure, false arrest, false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution in violation of their Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment right s. On July 31, 2017, the Court granted in part and denied in part Defendants' motion for summary judgment (the "Order").1 (Doc. 85). Specifically, the Court granted Defendants Anderson, Roberts, and Bones summary judgment on Plaintiff s' false arrest, unreasonable search and seizure, and malicious prosecution claims but denied summary judgment on Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Marrero. Defendants now move, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 6.3, for partial reconsiderati on of the Order, arguing that the Court should dismiss Plaintiffs' malicious prosecution claim against Detective Marrero. (Doc. 88) Plaintiffs also move for partial reconsideration of the Court's dismissal of Plaintiffs' malicious pros ecution claim. (Doc. 90). For the reason set forth above, Defendants' motion for partial reconsideration is GRANTED and Plaintiffs' motion id DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 87, 89. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 8/16/2017) (jwh) Modified on 8/17/2017 (jwh).
|
|
Filing
85
OPINION AND ORDER re: 83 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Counter-Counterstatement to Plaintiffs' Rule 56.1 Counterstatement [Docket No. 79] and the May 5, 2017 Declaration of Lucienne Pierre [Docket No. 80]; Opposing Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiffs filed by William Suarez, Angel Suarez, Sarah Ramos, 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Angel Bones, Jose Marrero, David J. Roberts, Abdiel Anderson, City of New York, 78 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages addressed to Judge Edgardo Ramos from Lucienne Pierre dated 5/4/2017 filed by Angel Bones, Jose Marrero, David J. Roberts, City of New York. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED in PART and GRANTED in PART. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 64, 78, 83. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 7/31/2017) (anc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
