Pouncy v. Advanced Focus LLC et al
| Larry Pouncy |
| Advanced Focus LLC, Todd Biederman, Bradley (Brad) Solomon and Sara Solomon-White |
| 1:2015cv06260 |
| August 7, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
126
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 124 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 121 Clerk's Judgment, filed by Larry Pouncy. By Opinion and Order entered September 25, 2017, the Court granted Defendant's motion for summary judgment in i ts entirety and denied Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment in its entirety, dismissing all of Plaintiffs claims and closing this case. (Docket No. 120). On October 25, 2017, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a motion for reconsideration of that decision. (Docket No. 124). Upon review of Plaintiff's papers, that motion is DENIED. Reconsideration of Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status on appeal is also denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 124 and to mail a copy of this Memorandum Opinion and Order to Plaintiff. The case remains closed, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 4/16/2018) (ras)
|
|
Filing
120
OPINION AND ORDER re: 78 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Advanced Focus LLC, Todd Biederman, Sara Solomon-White, Bradley (Brad) Solomon, 99 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Larry Pouncy, 92 MOTION for Summary Ju dgment, filed by Larry Pouncy. For the reasons stated above, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted in its entirety, and all of Pouncy's claims are dismissed. It follows that Pouncy's cross-motion for summary judgment m ust be and is denied. This Court certifies, pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Opinion and Order would not be taken in good faith, and in forma pauperis status is thus denied to Pouncy. See Coppe dge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 78, 92, and 99, to close this case, and to mail a copy of this Opinion and Order to Pouncy, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 9/25/2017) (ras)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
