Gelb v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
Bernard Gelb |
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Department of Homeland Security - Under Secretary for Management, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement |
1:2015cv06495 |
August 18, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Queens |
Robert W Sweet |
Freedom of Information Act |
05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Freedom of Information Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 51 OPINION re: 36 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by United States Department of Homeland Security - Under Secretary for Management, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, 34 LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File motion for summary judgment addressed to Judge Robert W. Sweet from AUSA Michael J. Byars dated March 30, 2017 filed by United States Department of Homeland Security - Under Secretary for Management, United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security. Based on the facts and conclusions set forth above, the Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted, and the Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment is denied. (Signed by Judge Robert W. Sweet on 9/15/2017) (mro) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.