In Re: Ampal - American Israel Corporation
Debtor: Ampal - American Israel Corporation
Appellant: Yosef A. Maiman and Merhav (M.N.F.) Limited
Appellee: Alex Spizz
Case Number: 1:2015cv06569
Filed: August 19, 2015
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: New York
Presiding Judge: Katherine Polk Failla
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 17 OPINION AND ORDER: The instant appeal is predicated on the fundamental misperception that what is in Appellants' interest is also in the estate's interest. Particularly given the facts and procedural history outlined above, that simply is not the case. Cf. In re Fletcher Int'l, Ltd., 536 B.R. 551, 562 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) ("First, Appellant's interest and the estate's interest are not identical. Appellant is one of many individuals asserting a claim to a portion o f the estate. The Trustee's obligation, and that of his appointed professionals, is to make decisions in the best interest of the estate's creditors and investors as a whole, not to do what is best for Appellant alone."). And whil e Appellants' professed concerns about estate professionals "switching sides" in the middle of a bankruptcy may be appropriate as a general matter, they are not implicated here. The Trustee may have changed firms, but he has not ch anged his positions or his mode of representing the estate, both of which have frequently brought him in conflict with Appellants. The Bankruptcy Court, which was in the very best position to observe the proceedings, saw no reason to remove the Tr ustee (or to deny him the professional assistance that he sought) and many reasons to keep him. This Court agrees. The judgment of the Bankruptcy Court is affirmed in all respects, and the appeal is dismissed. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close the case. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 7/18/2016) (tn)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: In Re: Ampal - American Israel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: Ampal - American Israel Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Yosef A. Maiman
Represented By: Daniel Alexander Fliman
Represented By: David M. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Merhav (M.N.F.) Limited
Represented By: Daniel Alexander Fliman
Represented By: David M. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Alex Spizz
Represented By: Arthur Goldstein
Represented By: Alex Spizz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?