Roe et al v. Town of Mamakating et al
| Duane Roe, Burlingham Woods LLC, Freeman Properties Inc. and Reinhardt Farms LLC |
| Town of Mamakating, Town of Mamakating Town Board, Town of Mamakating Planning Board, Stosh Zamonsky, Mort Starobin and William Herrmann |
| 1:2015cv06682 |
| August 24, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Sullivan |
| Katherine B. Forrest |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
OPINION & ORDER re: 29 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by Stosh Zamonsky, William Herrmann, Mort Starobin, Town of Mamakating Planning Board, Town of Mamakating, Town of Mamakating Town Board, 35 CROSS MOTION to Amend/Correct 4 Complaint, . filed by Reinhardt Farms LLC, Burlingham Woods LLC, Duane Roe, Freeman Properties Inc. For the reasons set forth above, defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED on the ground that plaintiffs' claims are not ripe for review; plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amended complaint is DENIED as futile. Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motions at ECF Nos. 29 and 35, and to terminate this action. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 6/9/2016) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
