Fajardo et al v. Arise News, Inc. et al
| Hakim Fajardo, Sheila Gaillard, Shari Raphael, Lauren Rossi and Amber Sizemore |
| Arise News, Inc., Arise Media UK Ltd., Nduka Obaigbena and Kenim Obaigbena |
| 1:2015cv06912 |
| September 1, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| P. Kevin Castel |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: granting 33 Motion to Strike; granting 33 Motion for Default Judgment. Plaintiffs' motion to enter default judgment and to strike the answers of Kenim Obaigbena and Nduka Obaigbena is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' motion to enter default judgment as to defendant Arise News, Inc. is also GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motion. (Docket # 33.)This action will be referred to Magistrate Judge Henry B. Pitman for the purpose of conducting an inquest on dama ges. No later than May 27, 2016, plaintiffs shall show cause in writing why the action against Arise Media UK Ltd. ought not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely and diligently serve process. Plaintiffs are directed to serve a copy of this Memorandum and Order upon Arise News, Inc., Kenim Obaigbena and Nduka Obaigbena. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 5/13/2016) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
