Galin v. Hamada
Reed Galin |
Kumitake Hamada |
1:2015cv06992 |
September 4, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Jesse M. Furman |
Other Personal Property Damage |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 OPINION AND ORDER re: 47 MOTION for Sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11, filed by Kunitake Hamada, 52 MOTION for Summary Judgment, filed by Kunitake Hamada. Hamada's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Galin 's claims are dismissed in their entirety. Additionally, Hamada's motion for sanctions under Rules 26 and 37 is DENIED, but his motion for sanctions under Rule 11 is GRANTED. Specifically, Galin and his counsel are ordered to reimburse H amada for his reasonable expenses, including attorney's fees, associated with the motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 52) and the motion for Rule 11 sanctions (Docket No. 47). Counsel shall confer in an effort to reach agreement on what c onstitutes such "reasonable expenses." Barring agreement, Hamada shall submit a fee application, supported by contemporaneous billing records, no later than thirty days from this Opinion and Order; Galin shall file any opposition within two weeks of any application. Absent leave of Court, Hamada may not file any reply. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket Nos. 47 and 52, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 9/26/2017) (ras) |
Filing 23 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 9 MOTION to Dismiss Complaint with Prejudice filed by Kunitake Hamada: Defendant's motion to dismiss is DENIED, except as to Plaintiff's unjust-enrichment claim, which is dismissed. Further , Defendant shall file his answer by May 31, 2016, and the parties shall appear for an initial pretrial conference with the Court on June 15, 2016, at 3:15 p.m. in Courtroom 1105 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York 10007. In light of the Court's ruling with respect to Defendant's Section 2-403 argument, the parties should be prepared to address at that conference (and should discuss with one another in advance of the conference) whether the Court should limit discovery in the first instance to the question of whether the entrustment provision applies to Coe-Kerr's purchase of the painting and then allow an early summary judgment motion on that question. The parties shall include their respective views on that issue in the joint letter that they are to submit by the Thursday prior to the initial pretrial conference, as directed in the Notice of Initial Pretrial Conference. (See Docket No. 4). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate Docket No. 9. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 5/10/2016) (tn) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Galin v. Hamada | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Reed Galin | |
Represented By: | Richard Allen Altman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Kumitake Hamada | |
Represented By: | Paul Cossu |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.