Vassallo v. City Of New York, et al
| Frank Vassallo |
| City of New York, Corizon Health, Inc., Corizon, Inc., New York City Health And Hospitals Corporation, Joseph Ponte, Martin Murphy, Errol Toulon, Raleem Moses, Daniel O'Connell and John/Jane Does 1-50 |
| 1:2015cv07125 |
| September 10, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Richmond |
| Katherine Polk Failla |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
OPINION AND ORDER re: 49 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint. filed by Corizon Health, Inc., Daniel O'Connell, Joseph Ponte, Errol Toulon, City of New York, Raleem Moses, Martin Murphy, Corizon, Inc., 46 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by New York City Health And Hospitals Corporation. For the foregoing reasons, the City Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and HHC's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff is permitted to file an amended complaint in accordance with this Opinion, if he wishes to, on or before December 22, 2016. The City Defendants can file an answer or other response within 21 days of the filing of the amended complaint. Thereafter, the Court will schedule a pretrial conference in the matter. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Amended Pleadings due by 12/22/2016.) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 11/22/2016) (cf)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
