Dragonfly Capital Partners, LLC v. Schnaier

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Dragonfly Capital Partners, LLC v. Schnaier

Dragonfly Capital Partners, LLC v. Schnaier

Plaintiff:	Dragonfly Capital Partners, LLC
Defendant:	Joe Schnaier
Case Number:	1:2015cv07190
Filed:	September 11, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 10, 2018	Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration filed by Dragonfly Capital Partners, LLC. For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The arbitration award is confirmed and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Dragonfly in the amount of $848,121.65 against Schnaier, plus interest at the statutory rate of nine percent from September 30, 2016 until the date of today's judgment. Plaintiff is also ordered to submit a supplemental statement on attorney's fees no later than April 23, 2018 providing evidence regarding reasonable attorney's fees and expenses. Defendant will be given the opportunity to file a brief objecti ng to the amount of any award by May 7, 2018, and Plaintiff's reply will be due May 14, 2018. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 22, and to mail a copy of this Order to Defendant. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/9/2018) (mro)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 10, 2018

Filing 31 OPINION AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Confirm Arbitration filed by Dragonfly Capital Partners, LLC. For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED. The arbitration award is confirmed and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Dragonfly in the amount of $848,121.65 against Schnaier, plus interest at the statutory rate of nine percent from September 30, 2016 until the date of today's judgment. Plaintiff is also ordered to submit a supplemental statement on attorney's fees no later than April 23, 2018 providing evidence regarding reasonable attorney's fees and expenses. Defendant will be given the opportunity to file a brief objecti ng to the amount of any award by May 7, 2018, and Plaintiff's reply will be due May 14, 2018. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 22, and to mail a copy of this Order to Defendant. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/9/2018) (mro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dragonfly Capital Partners, LLC v. Schnaier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dragonfly Capital Partners, LLC
Represented By:	Stephen Z Starr
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Joe Schnaier
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?