Brugman v. Commissioner of Social Security
||Commissioner of Social Security
||September 14, 2015
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||P. Kevin Castel
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 405
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|February 3, 2017
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION for 12 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Commissioner of Social Security, 20 Report and Recommendations. The Commissioner moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. (1 2)(c). (Dkts. 12-13). Burgman has not submitted any opposition to that motion. Magistrate Judge Gorenstein issued a Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") recommending that the motion for judgment on the pleadings be granted. (Dkt. 20). (As further set forth in this Order.) I have reviewed Magistrate JudgeGorenstein's thorough and well-reasoned R&R for clear error and have found none. Therefore, I adopt the Report and Recommendation in its entirety. The Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. 12) is GRANTED. (Signed by Judge P. Kevin Castel on 2/2/2017) (cf)
|January 10, 2017
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. For the foregoing reasons, the Commissioner's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Docket #12) should be granted. re: 12 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Commissioner of Social Security. Objections to R&R due by 1/24/2017 (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 1/9/2017) Copies Sent By Chambers to Merle Brugman, 55 West 100th Street, Apt. 9G, New York, NY 10025. Counsel by ECF. (rjm).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?