Grimmett v. New York City Department of Correctional Services et al
Paul Grimmett |
Corizon Correctional Medical Associates of New York, Allan Matthew, Sharma, Cooper and City of New York |
1:2015cv07351 |
September 16, 2015 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Dutchess |
Analisa Torres |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 91 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 73 MOTION to Dismiss filed by New York City Department of Correctional Services, Allan Matthew, Corizon Correctional Medical Associates of New York, Sharma. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket No. 73. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 5/24/2017) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (ama) |
Filing 23 OPINION AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by Paul Grimmett. Accordingly, the Court denies Grimmett's application without prejudice, with leave to reapply for counsel at a later date, when the Court has had an opportunity to more critically evaluate his claims. Until then, the Court encourages Grimmett to continue his efforts to retain pro bono counsel. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 22. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 1/14/2016) Copies Sent By Chambers. (kko) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.