Shultz v. Congregation Shearith Israel of the City of New York et al
| Alana Shultz |
| Congregation Shearith Israel of the City of New York, The Spanish and Portugese Synagogue, Meir Soloveichik and Michael Lustig |
| 1:2015cv07473 |
| September 22, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| J. Paul Oetken |
| Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 2601 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
OPINION AND ORDER re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint. filed by Congregation Shearith Israel of the City of New York, The Spanish and Portugese Synagogue, Michael Lustig, Barbara Reiss, Meir Soloveichik. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Court dismisses the federal claims for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) and dismisses the state- and city-law claims without prejudice because the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over those claims. Plaintiff is granted leave to file a Fourth Amended Complaint provided that she does so on or before September 15, 2016. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at Docket Number 26. (As further set forth in this Order), ( Amended Pleadings due by 9/15/2016.) (Signed by Judge J. Paul Oetken on 8/15/2016) (lmb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
