Mendoza et al v. La Pala, LLC et al
| Ignacio Mendoza |
| La Pala, LLC, Edena Barreto and Luigi Palazzo |
| 1:2015cv07970 |
| October 8, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
OPINION AND ORDER: Here, Plaintiffs submitted billing records detailing $27,285 for work incurred in the prosecution of this case over a period of almost two years. See Doc. 56-12. This work included drafting and filing the complaint, draf ting and responding to discovery requests, preparing for and attending settlement conferences with Magistrate Judge Freeman, preparing and filing an order to show cause for default, attending court conferences, and preparing damage calculations, plus the various costs related to filing the lawsuit. See id. Based on the work performed, the Court finds that the requested attorneys' fees and costs of $6,000 are objectively reasonable. In terms of the non-monetary provisions, the Court finds all of them to be fair and reasonable. The Agreement, attached as Exhibit 1 to Doc. 73, is SO ORDERED. The Amended Complaint, Doc. 25, is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 8/7/2017) (mro) Modified on 8/7/2017 (mro).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
