Martin et al v. Coinmach Corporation
| Lawrence Martin, Jean Pierre, Anthony Howell, Jean Innocent, Amis Kilburn and Alix Champagne |
| Coinmach Corporation |
| 1:2015cv08137 |
| October 15, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Shira A. Scheindlin |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
OPINION AND ORDER re: 28 MOTION for Leave to File amended complaint filed by Jean Innocent, Lawrence Martin, Jean Pierre, Anthony Howell, Alix Champagne, Amis Kilburn. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file an amende d complaint is GRANTED IN PART. By December 5, 2016, Plaintiffs may file an amended complaint including a disparate impact claim for pay discrimination based on Coinmach's merit increase policy, and a disparate impact claim for promotion dis crimination based on Coinmach's policy of failing to post open supervisory positions, insofar as such claims are not time-barred. Plaintiffs may not include claims pertaining to the CBA, Coinmach's acquisition agreements and the All-Star Rewards Incentive Program, as these sections of their Proposed Amended Complaint fail to state a claim and are thus futile. The Court requests that the Clerk of Court terminate the motion at ECF No. 28. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 11/29/2016) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
