Klein v. Cadian Capital Management, LP et al
||Cadian Capital Management, LP, Cadian Fund LP, Cadian Master Fund LP, Cadian GP, LLC, Cadian Capital Management GP, LLC, Eric Bannasch and Qlik Technologies Inc.
||October 15, 2015
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||15 U.S.C. § 78
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 15, 2017
OPINION AND ORDER re: 37 MOTION to Substitute Party. Old Party: Terry Klein, New Party: Qlik Technologies Inc. filed by Terry Klein, 31 MOTION to Dismiss: Terry Klein ("Klein" or "Plaintiff") brings this action pu rsuant to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b) ("Section 16(b)"), on behalf of nominal defendant Qlik Technologies, Inc. ("Qlik"), seeking disgorgement of so-called "short-swing" profits by defendants Cadian Capital Management, LP ("CCM"), and its client funds, related entities, and founder (together, "Cadian"). Pending before the Court is Cadian's motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12 (b)(1) to dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, Doc. 31, and Plaintiff's cross-motion to allow Qlik to be substituted as a plaintiff under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 17(a)(3) and 25(c), Doc. 37. For the reasons sta ted above, Cadian's motion to dismiss the Complaint is GRANTED and Klein's motion to substitute Qlik is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions, Docs. 31 and 37, and close the case. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/14/2017) (jwh)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?