Sellick v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Sellick v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Sellick v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Sharron Sellick
Defendant:	Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Case Number:	1:2015cv09082
Filed:	November 18, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Richard J. Sullivan
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 23, 2017	Filing 74 OPINION & ORDER re: 52 AMENDED MOTION for Attorney Fees (to assert Charging Lien Pursuant to N.Y. Judiciary Law Section 475) filed by Legal Momentum, 55 AMENDED MOTION to Seal Document filed by Legal Momentum, [6 5] MOTION to Seal Document filed by Sharron Sellick. For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that LM's motion for a charging lien pursuant to Section 475 (Doc. No. 52) is GRANTED, and that LM is entitled to r ecover a 15% pro rata share of the attorney's fees collected out of any settlement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to redact is GRANTED, and LM's motion to redact exhibit 7 of its opening declaration is also GRANTED. (Doc. Nos. 55, 65.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that LM shall file a letter brief and declaration no later than March 29, 2017 explaining why its July 26, 2016 reply declaration and Exhibits 1 and 7 of its July 28, 2016 reply declaration s hould remain under seal. (Doc. Nos. 71, 73-1, 73-7.) The Clerk is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 52, 55, and 65. In light of the parties' representation that they have reached a settlement in principl e, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice but without costs. However, within thirty days of the date of this Order, any party may send a letter requesting to restore this action to the docket with an explanation for the request. The Clerk is respectfully directed to close this case. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 3/23/2017) (mro) Modified on 3/24/2017 (mro).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 23, 2017

Filing 74 OPINION & ORDER re: 52 AMENDED MOTION for Attorney Fees (to assert Charging Lien Pursuant to N.Y. Judiciary Law Section 475) filed by Legal Momentum, 55 AMENDED MOTION to Seal Document filed by Legal Momentum, [6 5] MOTION to Seal Document filed by Sharron Sellick. For the reasons set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that LM's motion for a charging lien pursuant to Section 475 (Doc. No. 52) is GRANTED, and that LM is entitled to r ecover a 15% pro rata share of the attorney's fees collected out of any settlement. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to redact is GRANTED, and LM's motion to redact exhibit 7 of its opening declaration is also GRANTED. (Doc. Nos. 55, 65.) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that LM shall file a letter brief and declaration no later than March 29, 2017 explaining why its July 26, 2016 reply declaration and Exhibits 1 and 7 of its July 28, 2016 reply declaration s hould remain under seal. (Doc. Nos. 71, 73-1, 73-7.) The Clerk is respectfully directed to terminate the motions pending at docket numbers 52, 55, and 65. In light of the parties' representation that they have reached a settlement in principl e, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is dismissed with prejudice but without costs. However, within thirty days of the date of this Order, any party may send a letter requesting to restore this action to the docket with an explanation for the request. The Clerk is respectfully directed to close this case. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge Richard J. Sullivan on 3/23/2017) (mro) Modified on 3/24/2017 (mro).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sellick v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sharron Sellick
Represented By:	Alice Goldman Reiter
Represented By:	Mariann Meier Wang
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Represented By:	Lorie Elizabeth Almon
Represented By:	Scott Roblan Rabe
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?