Flores v. Studio Castellano Architect, P.C. et al
| Kevin Flores |
| Studio Castellano Architect, P.C. and Ronald Castellano |
| 1:2015cv09158 |
| November 20, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Kings |
| Thomas P. Griesa |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
OPINION: On November 20, 2015, plaintiff Kevin Flores filed a complaint in the Southern District of New York against defendants Studio Castellano Architect, P.C., and Ronald Castellano ("Defendants"), alleging violations of the Fair Labor S tandards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., and New York Labor Law ("NYLL"), Art. 19 § 650 et seq., related to plaintiff's hours of work and payment of wages, including overtime wages. See ECF No. 1; ECF No. 30, Ex. 1, at 1. On March 7, 201 7, the parties informed the court that they had reached a settlement and submitted the proposed terms and supporting documentation. ECF No. 30 , Ex. 1-2. For the reasons provided above, the court approves of the propose d FLSA settlement as both reasonable and fair. In light of the settlement, the action is dismissed with prejudice and without costs. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to mark this matter closed. (Signed by Judge Thomas P. Griesa on 10/2/2017) (jwh)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
