Artec Construction and Development Corp. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, et al.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Artec Construction and Development Corp. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, et al.

Artec Construction and Development Corp. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, et al.

Plaintiff:	Artec Construction and Development Corp.
Defendant:	New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development and New York City Department of Investigation
Case Number:	1:2015cv09494
Filed:	December 4, 2015
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Katherine Polk Failla
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	Defendant

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 28, 2017	Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 35 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, filed by City Of New York. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 11/28/2017) (ap)
February 27, 2017	Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Motion filed by New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, New York City Department of Investigation. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants 9; motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice to refile. Plaintiff is granted leave to file the PSAC contained in Exhibit 1 of its opposition brief (see Dkt. #25-1). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 22. The p arties are hereby ORDERED to appear for a conference on March 22, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 618 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York, to discuss an expedited briefing schedule in the event that Defendants w ish to refile their motion to dismiss. Any deadlines to answer specified under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 and 15 are stayed pending further order of the Court. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) ( Status Conference set for 3/22/2017 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 618, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Katherine Polk Failla.) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/27/2017) (mro)

Date Filed

Document Text

November 28, 2017

Filing 40 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 35 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint, filed by City Of New York. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all pending motions, adjourn all remaining dates, and close this case, and as further set forth in this order. (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 11/28/2017) (ap)

February 27, 2017

Filing 32 OPINION AND ORDER re: 22 MOTION to Dismiss Notice of Motion filed by New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, New York City Department of Investigation. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants 9; motion to dismiss is DENIED without prejudice to refile. Plaintiff is granted leave to file the PSAC contained in Exhibit 1 of its opposition brief (see Dkt. #25-1). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion at docket entry 22. The p arties are hereby ORDERED to appear for a conference on March 22, 2017, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 618 of the Thurgood Marshall Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York, to discuss an expedited briefing schedule in the event that Defendants w ish to refile their motion to dismiss. Any deadlines to answer specified under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12 and 15 are stayed pending further order of the Court. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) ( Status Conference set for 3/22/2017 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 618, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Katherine Polk Failla.) (Signed by Judge Katherine Polk Failla on 2/27/2017) (mro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Artec Construction and Development Corp. v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development, et al.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Artec Construction and Development Corp.
Represented By:	Jamie Aron Forman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development
Represented By:	Jenna Lynn Krueger
Represented By:	Lewis R. Lear
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: New York City Department of Investigation
Represented By:	Jenna Lynn Krueger
Represented By:	Lewis R. Lear
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?