Export-Import Bank of the Republic of China v. Central Bank of Liberia
||Export-Import Bank of the Republic of China
||Central Bank of Liberia
||December 7, 2015
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||XX Out of U.S.
||Andrew L. Carter
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1330
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|December 13, 2017
OPINION AND ORDER re: 76 JOINT MOTION to Vacate (Joint Motion for Indicative Ruling Pursuant to FRCP 62.1). filed by Central Bank of Liberia, 74 JOINT MOTION to Vacate 62 Order on Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Jurisdiction, 66 Memorandum & Opinion,, Pursuant to FRCP 54(b). filed by Central Bank of Liberia. For the reasons set forth above, the parties' motion for an indicative ruling pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1 seeking to vacate the March Order and April Opinion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b) is GRANTED, and the Court states that it would grant the parties' motion to vacate if jurisdiction is restored to this Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 12/13/2017) (rj)
|April 12, 2017
MEMORANDUM OPINION: The primary issue here is whether CBL waived sovereign immunity on its loan agreements and is amenable to this Court's jurisdiction. The Court holds that CBL explicitly waived sovereign immunity for reasons that follow in th is memorandum opinion; and as further set forth herein. For the reasons stated above, the Court affirms its order denying Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1). (Signed by Judge Andrew L. Carter, Jr on 4/12/2017) (anc)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?