Mahoney v. Endo Health Solutions, Inc. et al
| Shannon Mahoney |
| Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Generics International (US Parent), Inc., Generics International (US), Inc., Generics Bidco I, LLC, Generics Bidco II, LLC, Generics International (US Holdco), Inc., Generics International (US Midco), Inc. and Vintage Pharmaceuticals, LLC |
| 1:2015cv09841 |
| December 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Orange |
| Denise L. Cote |
| Contract Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 dtp Diversity - Deceptive Trade Practices |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
111
ORDER granting 110 MOTION FOR CY PRES DISTRIBUTION OF REMAINING SETTLEMENT. It is hereby ORDERED that the $181,936.51 in remaining undistributed settlement funds shall be distributed to the AADP Foundation, the charitable arm of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry ("AADP").. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 8/10/2020) (jca) Transmission to Finance Unit (Cashiers) for processing.
|
|
Filing
78
OPINION AND ORDER.....The defendants April 19, 2016 motion to dismiss is granted in part. The following claims remain: (1) the § 349 claim; (2) breach of express warranty; and (3) the fraud and fraudulent concealment claims. (Signed by Judge Denise L. Cote on 7/20/2016) (gr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
