Wang et al v. ABC Corp. et al
| Xue Ming Wang |
| ABC Corp., Abumi Sushi Inc., Qing Zhong Li, Cheng Chao Zhao, John Doe and Jane Doe |
| 1:2015cv09860 |
| December 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Gregory H. Woods |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 216 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
58
OPINION AND ORDER re: 34 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Xue Ming Wang, 39 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Abumi Sushi Inc., Qing Zhong Li. For the reasons described above, the Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to present evidence entitling him to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of successorship liability. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment on that issue is DENIED. With respect to the A ppearing Defendants' motion for partial summary judgment, Plaintiff has failed to create a triable issue of fact on the issue of successorship liability, and that motion is therefore GRANTED. As a result, all federal and state claims arising from pre-June 2, 2015 conduct are hereby DISMISSED as to the Appearing Defendants, and the case will proceed against them only on claims arising from conduct on or after June 2, 2015. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions pending at Dkt. Nos. 34 and 39. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 8/14/2017) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
