Lee-Walker v. New York City Department Of Education et al
Jeena Lee-Walker |
New York City Department Of Education, Fred Walsh, Stephen Noonan, Christopher Yarmy and Benny Ureana |
1:2016cv00109 |
January 6, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Albany |
John G. Koeltl |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 26 OPINION AND ORDER re: 16 MOTION to Amend/Correct 3 Complaint . filed by Jeena Lee-Walker, 12 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint. filed by New York City Department Of Education, Benny Ureana, Fred Walsh, Christopher Yarmy, Stephen Noonan. The complaint alleges that the defendants retaliated against the plaintiff in violation of her First Amendment and due process rights. The following facts alleged in the complaint are accepted as true for the purposes of the motion to dismiss. (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons explained above, the defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint is granted, and the complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint is denied without prejudice as moot. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment dismissing the complaint and closing the case. The Clerk is also directed to close all pending motions. (Signed by Judge John G. Koeltl on 11/22/2016) (cf) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.