Schramm et al v. City Of New York et al.
| Robert A. Schramm and Gabriela Saenz |
| City Of New York, Emmanuel DelaCruz, Alan Hassel and John Doe #1-4 |
| 1:2016cv00553 |
| January 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Albany |
| Alvin K. Hellerstein |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 84 Order on Motion for Summary Judgment. in favor of City Of New York, Emmanuel DelaCruz, Noel Jugraj against Gabriela Saenz, Robert A. Schramm. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Order dated December 11, 2019, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted and Plaintiffs' motion for partial summary judgment is denied; accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 12/13/2019) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal)(dt)
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT. denying 62 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 65 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 66 Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted and Plaintiffs' motion fo r partial summary judgment is denied. The Clerk will terminate the motions (ECF Nos. 62, 65, 66), and mark the case closed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alvin K. Hellerstein on 12/11/19) (yv) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
