Drew v. City of New York et al
| Keith Drew |
| City of New York, Deputy Warden Williams, Deputy Warden Fadina, Captain Council and Correction Officer Brazil |
| 1:2016cv00594 |
| January 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Queens |
| Unassigned |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
OPINION & ORDER re: 27 MOTION for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 filed by Deputy Warden Fadina, Warden Augustus, Correction Officer Jackson, Captain Council, City of New York. For the reasons set forth above, defendants' summary judgment motion (Dkt. No. 27) is DENIED as to Drew's excessive force claim against C.O. Jackson, and otherwise is GRANTED. The Court will hold a status conference in courtroom 20D, 500 Pearl Street, on September 8, 2016 at 9:30 A.M. Defense counsel is to arrange with the prison for Mr. Drew to appear telephonically by calling chambers (212-805-0036) at the scheduled time. Captain Council, City of New York, John Does (1-7), Deputy Warden Fadina, Captain Ro llison, Deputy Warden Williams, Warden Augustus and Correction Officer Brazil terminated. (Status Conference set for 9/8/2016 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 20D, 500 Pearl Street, New York, NY 10007 before Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Peck on 8/29/2016) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (tn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
