Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 14-14B, AFL-CIO v. Claude O. Powell, Jr.
Edwin L. Christian, Don DeNardo, Ernesto Tersigni, Kenneth Klemens, Jr., Christopher T. Confrey, Denise M. Richardson, John Cronin and John F. O'Hare |
Claude O. Powell, Jr. |
1:2016cv00673 |
January 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Queens |
Katherine B. Forrest |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1001 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 52 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court hereby GRANTS plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on costs and attorneys' fees, and GRANTS plaintiffs' motion for judgment on the pleadings as to defendant's counterclaim. Judgment is en tered for plaintiffs in the amount of $17,948.50. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 38 and 46 and to terminate this action. SO ORDERED. re: 38 MOTION for Attorney Fees & Costs filed by Christopher T . Confrey, Kenneth Klemens, Jr., Don DeNardo, Denise M. Richardson, John Cronin, Ernesto Tersigni, John F. O'Hare, Edwin L. Christian, 46 CROSS MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings dismissing Defendant's counterclaim filed by Christopher T. Confrey, Kenneth Klemens, Jr., Denise M. Richardson, Don DeNardo, John Cronin, Ernesto Tersigni, John F. O'Hare, Edwin L. Christian. (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 1/30/2017) Copies Sent By Chambers. (rjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.