Murphy et al v. General Motors L.L.C. et al
| Kari Most Murphy and Park Murphy |
| General Motors L.L.C., Delphi Automotive, LLC and "John" Doe |
| 1:2016cv00678 |
| January 29, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Jesse M. Furman |
| Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
184
ORDER: As discussed, and for the reasons stated, on the record during the telephone conference conducted on January 7, 2021: Plaintiffs shall make any motion for contempt sanctions by formal motion in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Proced ure and Local Rules no later than January 12, 2021. Defendants shall file any opposition no later than January 22, 2021. Any reply shall be filed no later than January 26, 2021. No later than January 13, 2021, counsel for Defendants shall either file a notice of substitution of counsel; move to withdraw; or indicate that a change of counsel is not necessary. Any motion to withdraw should indicate whether Plaintiffs or Defendants intend to oppose the motion and, if so, propose an expedited schedu le for resolving the motion. Plaintiffs shall move for final approval of the proposed class action settlement no later than January 21, 2021. Any opposition shall be filed no later than January 26, 2021. No reply may be filed absent leave of Court. U nless and until the Court orders otherwise, the fairness hearing will proceed as scheduled on January 28, 2021 at 3:00 p.m. and will be conducted remotely by teleconference. At least twenty-four hours before the conference, counsel shall send a joint email to the Court with the names and telephone numbers of those who will have speaking roles at the conference, and the Court will provide call-in information to those counsel. All others - counsel who will not have speaking roles, class members, a nd members of the public - may listen to the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference call line at (888) 363-4749 and using access code 542-1540 followed by the pound (#) key. The parties are reminded to follow the procedures for t eleconferences described in the Court's Emergency Individual Rules and Practices in Light of COVID-19, which are available at https://nysd.uscourts.gov/hon-jesse-mfurman. (Motions due by 1/21/2021. Responses due by 1/26/2021. Replies due by 1/26/2021. Telephone Conference set for 1/28/2021 at 03:00 PM before Judge Jesse M. Furman.) (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 1/8/2021) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
162
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on [161 IN 16-cv-678; 7699 in 14-MD2543] JOINT LETTER terminating (7637) Motion to Dismiss in case 1:14-md-02543-JMF; terminating (147) Motion to Dismiss; terminating (152) Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Repl y in case 1:16-cv-00678-JMF. ENDORSEMENT: Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate 14-MD-2543, ECF No. 7637 and 16-CV-678, ECF No. 152. The parties shall include an update in future monthly related case updates. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 2/3/2020) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-md-02543-JMF, 1:16-cv-00678-JMF (jwh)
|
|
Filing
144
ORDER APPOINTING DANIEL J. BALHOFF AS SPECIAL MASTER IN THE MEDIATION OF THE MURPHYS CLAIMS. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53, this Court, hereby ORDERS THAT: 1. Daniel J. Balhoff is hereby appointed as Special Master to serve as medi ator to facilitate the potential resolution of plaintiffs' lawsuit in a manner acceptable to both parties. 2. The parties shall be equally responsible for the payment of Mr. Balhoff's fee for mediating this claim and any related expenses . To minimize travel expenses for plaintiffs and their counsel, this mediation shall be conducted in Tulsa, Oklahoma at a location agreeable to both parties and Mr. Balhoff. 3. Mr. Balhoff shall proceed with all reasonable diligence. 4. Mr. Balhoff shall use his experience and judgment to structure the mediation in manner to best facilitate potential resolution of the claim. Mr. Balhoff may have confidential ex parte communications with plaintiffs and New GM in relation to his role as Speci al Master, and to the extent either party engaged in ex parte communications with Mr. Balhoff, such ex parte communications shall not be deemed to have waived any attorney-client or other privileges. 5. To execute the responsibilities and duties of his office, Mr. Balhoff shall be vested by this Court with all necessary powers to act as an effective mediator as allowed by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53. 6. Unless expressly authorized in writing by both counsel for plaintiffs and counsel for New GM, Mr. Balhoff shall not disclose any confidential information or documents obtained through or created in his role. Likewise, all communications by counsel for plaintiffs, plaintiffs, and counsel for New GM with one another and with the mediator shall be kept strictly confidential by the parties, and shall be subject to Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. 7. While the Court does not currently anticipate requesting a formal report and recommendation from Mr. Balhoff, see Fe d. R. Civ. P. 53(b)(2)(C)-(D), (e), if the Court does request the same, Mr. Balhoff shall reduce any formal order, finding, report, or recommendation to writing to be filed under seal, as determined by the Court. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 12/6/19) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:14-md-02543-JMF, 1:16-cv-00678-JMF(yv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
