Cohen v. KIND LLC

Cohen v. KIND LLC

Plaintiff:	Barry A. Cohen
Defendant:	Kind L.L.C.
Case Number:	1:2016cv00959
Filed:	February 9, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	XX Out of State
Presiding Judge:	William H. Pauley
Nature of Suit:	Other Contract
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 15, 2016	Filing 25 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff Barry Cohen filed this action against KIND L.L.C. in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas in Ohio, alleging that KIND's labeling of its snack foods as "healthy" and "all natural" deceived consumers in violation of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act ("CSPA"), R.C. 1345.01 et seq. KIND removed the action to the Northern District of Ohio on an assertion of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Plaintiff moved to remand the action to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas on the ground that no federal subject matter jurisdiction existed. Thereafter, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation (the "JPML") granted KIND 's motion to transfer the action to this Court as related to In re KIND LLC "Healthy and All Natural" Litig., No. 15~md-2645-WHP (S.D.N.Y.), MDL No. 2645. For the foregoing reasons, the Clerk of Court is directed to remand this action to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 9/15/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:15-md-02645-WHP, 1:16-cv-00959-WHP(mro)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 15, 2016

Filing 25 OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiff Barry Cohen filed this action against KIND L.L.C. in the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas in Ohio, alleging that KIND's labeling of its snack foods as "healthy" and "all natural" deceived consumers in violation of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act ("CSPA"), R.C. 1345.01 et seq. KIND removed the action to the Northern District of Ohio on an assertion of diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a). Plaintiff moved to remand the action to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas on the ground that no federal subject matter jurisdiction existed. Thereafter, the Judicial Panel on Multi-District Litigation (the "JPML") granted KIND 's motion to transfer the action to this Court as related to In re KIND LLC "Healthy and All Natural" Litig., No. 15~md-2645-WHP (S.D.N.Y.), MDL No. 2645. For the foregoing reasons, the Clerk of Court is directed to remand this action to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 9/15/2016) Filed In Associated Cases: 1:15-md-02645-WHP, 1:16-cv-00959-WHP(mro)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cohen v. KIND LLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Barry A. Cohen
Represented By:	Mark Schlachet
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kind L.L.C.
Represented By:	Carmine R. Zarlenga, III
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?