Stajic v. The City Of New York , et al
| Marina Stajic |
| The City Of New York ,, Barbara Sampson and Timothy Kupferschmid |
| 1:2016cv01258 |
| February 18, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| New York |
| Gregory H. Woods |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 94 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Barbara Sampson, The City Of New York, Timothy Kupferschmid. For the foregoing reasons, summary judgment is DENIED as to the Monell claim, the retaliation claims with respect to the CFS Statements and the CFS Votes, and the age discrimination claim. Summary judgment is GRANTED as to the § 995-a claim and the retaliation claim concerning the 2013 Statement to Dr. Sampson. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 94. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/27/2018) (anc)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 27 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Barbara Sampson, The City Of New York, Timothy Kupferschmid. For these reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amendment retaliation claim is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motion pending at Dkt. No. 27. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Gregory H. Woods on 9/30/2016) (kko)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
