Lynch et al v. Amoruso et al
Michael A. Lynch and Lisa Scarola |
Sreelekha Chakrabarty Amoruso, DeMille Halliburton, Camille Halliburton Huang, John Doe(s) 1-17 and Jane Doe(s) 1-6 |
1:2016cv01270 |
February 18, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
Alison J. Nathan |
Other Fraud |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1341 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER granting 50 Motion to Dismiss; granting 58 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons provided above, the Court grants Defendants' motions to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. The amended complaint is dis missed with prejudice, as amendment would be futile and cause unnecessary delay. See Milanese v. Rust-Oleum Corp., 244 F.3d 104, 110 (2d Cir. 2001); Dkt No. 36 (order from this Court granting Plaintiffs leave to amend in response to the motion to dis miss and stating that failure to cure any defects "may well constitute a waiver of the Plaintiffs' right" to amend the complaint). This resolves Docket Numbers 50, 58. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/08/2017) (ama) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.