Unknown Plaintiff v. McGarrity
Defendant: Thomas McGarrity
Case Number: 1:2016cv01324
Filed: February 19, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Albany
Presiding Judge: Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit: Contract: Recovery/Enforcement
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 64 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 24 FIRST MOTION to Dismiss of Thomas McGarrity and Rosenblatt & McGarrity LLP filed by Thomas McGarrity: For reasons stated above, Plaintiff has failed adequately to plead diversity jurisdiction. If the Court did have jurisdiction, it would hold that Plaintiff has failed to state a claim either for breach of contract or legal malpractice and, thus, finds that amendment of the Complaint would be futile. Accordingly, Defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 24, 25) are granted, and all other pending motions are denied as moot. The case is dismissed. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 5/24/2017) (jwh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Unknown Plaintiff v. McGarrity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomas McGarrity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?