Park v. FDM Group Inc. et al
| Grace Park |
| FDM Group Holdings PLC and FDM Group, Inc. |
| 1:2016cv01520 |
| February 26, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 216 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
370
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, APPROVAL OF THE FLSA SETTLEMENT AND APPROVAL OF ATTORNEYS' FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES granting 363 Motion for Settlement; granting 366 Motion for Attorney Fees. For purposes of this Order and Final Judgment, the Court adopts and incorporates the definitions as set forth in the Settlement Agreement executed by the Parties and filed with this Court...Though the Court retains jurisdiction over this action for the purpose of enforcing the Settlement Agreement, the judgment is a Final Judgment in accordance with the Settlement Agreement. The parties shall abide by all terms of the Settlement Agreement and this Order, and as further set forth herein. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 1/22/2021) (ras)
|
|
Filing
330
ORDER: For the avoidance of doubt, the December 11, 2019 status conference is adjourned pursuant to the stay of discovery. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 12/5/2019) (ras)
|
|
Filing
107
OPINION & ORDER: Plaintiffs' motion for conditional certification of a collective action under the FLSA is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The Court authorizes notice to be sent to all FDM Consultants employed by Defendant within three years plus 881 days of the date of the notice. The parties shall file a proposed notice no later than seven days from the date of this Order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on 05/22/2019) (ras)
|
|
Filing
65
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 56 MOTION for Reconsideration re; 55 Clerk's Judgment, 54 Memorandum & Opinion, filed by Grace Park. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration and Relief under Federal Rule s of Civil Procedure 59 and 60 is granted insofar as the Court permits Plaintiff to move to amend her complaint, and Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend her pleading is granted with respect to Plaintiff's overtime claim, but denied with r espect to Plaintiff's minimum wage claims. The dismissal with prejudice of Plaintiff's other claims stands, but the judgment will be vacated to permit continuation of the litigation with respect to the overtime pay claims. This Memorandum Order resolves Docket Entry No. 56. The Clerk of the Court is directed to vacate the judgment and reopen the case.SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 8/28/2018) (ama)
|
|
Filing
54
MEMORANDUM ORDER AND OPINION: re: 21 MOTION to Certify Class Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certification and Court-Authorized Notice Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) filed by Grace Park, 27 MOTION to Dismiss filed by FDM Group, In c., FDM Group Holdings PLC. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss the FAC is granted. In light of the dismissal of the case, Plaintiff's motion for conditional certification and notice is deemed moot. This Memorandum Opinion and Order resolves docket entry numbers 21 and 27. The Clerk of the Court is requested to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/09/2017) (ama)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
