Windsor Securities, LLC v. Arent Fox LLP et al
Windsor Securities, LLC |
Arent Fox LLP and Julius Rousseau, III., Esquire |
1:2016cv01533 |
February 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Montgomery |
George B. Daniels |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 114 MEMORANDUM ORDER: In light of the above, we conclude that the 20 hours of preparation time already paid by defendants is more than reasonable. We need not reach the question of how many hours we would award had defendant not already agreed to pay the 20-hour figure. Accordingly, plaintiff's motion (Docket # 109) is denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 8/07/2018) (ama) |
Filing 84 MEMORANDUM OPINION: The Court accepts that travel to Atlanta for two depositions may burden Windsor. But after considering the factors listed above, we find that the burden is not inordinate and that reallocating costs is not justified. Windsor's application is therefore denied. And as set forth herein. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 9/26/2017) (ama) |
Filing 66 OPINION AND ORDER: re: 54 MOTION TO COMPEL. For the foregoing reasons, defendants' motion to compel (Docket # 54) is Denied. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein on 8/11/2017) (ama) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.