Shelton v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
Angela Shelton |
Prudential Insurance Company of America |
1:2016cv01559 |
February 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
Suffolk |
Valerie E. Caproni |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 OPINION & ORDER re: 28 LETTER MOTION for Leave to File addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni from Jeffrey Delott dated May 23, 2016. filed by Angela Shelton, 23 LETTER MOTION for Conference requesting a teleconference wi th Chambers regarding Prudential's proposed motion to strike Plaintiff's May 14, 2016 Affirmation and Memorandum of Law (ECF Nos. 21 & 22) addressed to Judge Valerie E. Caproni filed by Prudential Insurance Company of America. Plaint iff's request for discovery outside of the administrative record is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff may seek discovery outside of the administrative record, but Plaintiff's current discovery requests are overbroad. Accordingly, the parties are required to meet and confer to limit the scope of Plaintiff's discovery. If the parties cannot reach agreement, within two weeks of the date of this Order, the parties must submit a joint letter indic ating the discovery requests on which they agree and those on which they disagree and must submit a Case Management Plan in accordance with the Court's March 2, 2016 Order (Dkt. 5). At that time, the Court will schedule a conference to resolve t he parties' discovery disputes and to set a discovery schedule. If the parties can reach agreement, within two weeks of the date of this Order, the parties must submit both a joint letter informing the Court that they have agreed to the scope o f discovery and a Case Management Plan. At that time, the Court will schedule a conference to set a discovery schedule. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for a teleconference in advance of filing a motion to strike or in the alternat ive for leave to file an opposition to Plaintiff's May 14, 2016 Memorandum of Law (Dkt. 21) is DENIED. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a reply to Defendant's future opposition is also DENIED as moot. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close docket entries 23 and 28. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge Valerie E. Caproni on 6/8/2016) (spo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Shelton v. Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Angela Shelton | |
Represented By: | Jeffrey David Delott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Prudential Insurance Company of America | |
Represented By: | Robert Tadeusz Szyba |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.