Arriaga v. Gage et al
Plaintiff: |
Anthony Arriaga |
Defendant: |
Dr. Dana Gage, Dr. Razia K. Ferdous, C.O. A. Alvarado and Dr. Joshua Vernatter |
Case Number: |
1:2016cv01628 |
Filed: |
March 3, 2016 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Office: |
Foley Square Office |
County: |
Westchester |
Presiding Judge: |
Loretta A. Preska |
Nature of Suit: |
Prison Condition |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
August 25, 2020 |
Filing
123
ORDER: The Court has been informed that the Parties have reached a settlement in principle in this case. Accordingly, it hereby ORDERED that this action is dismissed without costs and without prejudice to restoring the action to the Court' ;s calendar, provided the application to restore the action is made within forty-five (45) days of this Order. Any application to reopen filed after forty-five (45) days from the date of this Order may be denied solely on that basis. Any pending motions are DISMISSED as moot, and all conferences are CANCELED. SO-ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 8/25/2020) (va)
|
June 5, 2020 |
Filing
117
ORDER: The case management conference scheduled for June 12, 2020 in front of me is adjourned. The conference will be rescheduled once discovery is complete. Counsel for Defendants are instructed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff and provide proof of service on the docket. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Philip M. Halpern on 6/5/2020) (ks)
|
April 3, 2020 |
Filing
114
ORDER: The telephonic status conference currently scheduled for Thursday, April 9, 2020, at 9:30 a.m., before the undersigned will be adjourned to Friday, May 8, 2020, at 9:30 a.m. In addition, there will be a thirty (30) day extension to all outstanding discovery deadlines. ( Telephone Conference set for 5/8/2020 at 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith.) Copies Sent by Chambers (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 4/2/2020) (cf)
|
November 21, 2019 |
Filing
110
ORDER FOR THE DEPOSITION OF THE PLAINTIFF: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Assistant Attorney General may take the deposition of plaintiff Anthony Arriaga, 06-A-0542, before a notary public, or some other officer authorized to administer oaths by the laws of the United States or of the State of New York, at any New York State Correctional Facility, upon notice to the plaintiff and Superintendent of the correctional facility where he is located, and Plaintiff is further advised that if he fails to attend and complete his own deposition, the Court may impose sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(d), which may include an order dismissing the case. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 11/21/2019) (cf)
|
May 9, 2019 |
Filing
94
OPINION AND ORDER re: 90 MOTION to Dismiss Amended Complaint as to CO Alvarado filed by C.O. A. Alvarado. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion is DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the Mo tion at ECF No. 90. Alvarado is directed to file an answer on before May 24, 2019. After filing an answer, Defendant is directed to confer with Plaintiff and submit a completed case management to the Court by June 14, 2019. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiff at his address as listed on ECF. C.O. A. Alvarado answer due 5/24/2019. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 5/9/2019) (ne) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?