Williams v. New York State Unified Court System Office of Court Administration et al
| Shannon Williams |
| New York State Unified Court System Office of Court Administration, Joseph Accetta, Johanna O'Brien and Susan Newman Loehr |
| 1:2016cv02061 |
| March 21, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Vernon S. Broderick |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
235
CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 230 Memorandum & Opinion, in favor of New York State Unified Court System Office of Court Administration, Johanna O'Brien, Joseph Accetta, Susan Newman Loehr against Shannon Williams. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGE D AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated August 10, 2021, OCA's and the Individual Defendants' motions for summary judgment are GRANTED. Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED; accordingly, this case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 9/8/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Right to Appeal) (dt)
|
|
Filing
234
ORDER re: 230 Memorandum & Opinion,,,, 233 Letter, filed by Susan Newman Loehr, New York State Unified Court System Office of Court Administration, Johanna O'Brien, Joseph Accetta, Shannon Williams. Plaintiff has failed to demo nstrate good cause to overcome the presumption in favor of public access to judicial documents. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to make my Opinion & Order, Document 230, available to the public. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 8/24/2021) (kv)
|
|
Filing
232
ORDER granting 231 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application Granted. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 8/13/21) (yv)
|
|
Filing
51
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION: For the reasons stated here, the Individual Defendants' motion for partial dismissal, (Doc. 40), is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Count II is dismissed in its entirety. Counts I, III and IV are dismissed in part, as they fail to state a claim for: (1) hostile work environment against the Individual Defendants, (2) discrimination and retaliation under § 1983 and the NYSHRL against the Individual Defendants based on Plaintiff's July 2013 Suspension ; (3) discrimination and retaliation under § 1983 and the NYSHRL against Defendant O'Brien based on the decision to place Plaintiff on probation; (4) discrimination and retaliation under § 1983 and the NYSHRL against Defendant O 9;Brien based on the June 2015 Termination; (5) retaliation under § 1983 and the NYSHRL against Defendant Loehr; and (6) sex discrimination under the NYSHRL against the Individual Defendants. The parties are instructed to meet and confer regar ding the scheduling of discovery and should submit a proposed case management plan and scheduling order on or before October 27, 2017. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion at Document 40. (Signed by Judge Vernon S. Broderick on 9/30/2017) (rj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
