Frazer v. United States of America
||United States of America
||March 21, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||Foley Square Office
||John F. Keenan
|Nature of Suit:
||Motions to Vacate Sentence
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|March 31, 2021
OPINION & ORDER: For the reasons set forth above, Defendant Jamal Frazer's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence is DENIED. The Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability because Frazer has not made a "substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2); Krantz v. United States, 224 F.3d 125, 127 (2d Cir. 2000); White, 2020 WL 5898680, at *6. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) (3), th at any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the motions docketed at ECF No. 245, 284, and 294 in criminal case ll-CR-00912-JFK-5 and close civil case 16-CV-02087-JFK. (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 3/31/2021) (cf)
|June 3, 2020
ORDER: The stay of proceedings imposed by the Court on July 18, 2018, is hereby LIFTED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Jamal Frazer's request for appointment of new counsel is DENIED. Frazer's counsel has already filed a 22-page supplemental memorandum of law in support of Frazer's petition for a writ of habeas corpus. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John F. Keenan on 6/3/2020) (mml)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?