Camarano v. Griffin
Plaintiff: Robert Camarano
Defendant: T. Griffin
Case Number: 1:2016cv02095
Filed: March 21, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Dutchess
Presiding Judge: Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER denying as moot 64 Motion for Extension of Time; denying as moot 64 Motion for Extension of Time to File. This Court has reviewed Petitioner's motion for an extension of time to file a Notice of Appeal (ECF No. 64). Because Petit ioner timely filed a Notice of Appeal on April 21, 2021 (ECF No. 65), his motion for an extension of time is denied as moot. Chambers staff will mail a copy of this Order to Petitioner. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 5/4/2021) (kv)
March 25, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 63 CLERK'S JUDGMENT re: 62 Order in favor of T. Griffin against Robert Camarano. It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Memorandum & Order dated March 25, 2021, Camarano's habeas petit ion is denied. Because Camarano has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). In addition, this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. &# 167; 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 3/25/2021) (Attachments: # 1 Right to Appeal) (km)
December 3, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 59 ORDER re: 57 Letter, filed by Robert Sherod Camarano. The Clerk of Court has no record of receiving any filing fee in this civil action. Accordingly, Petitioner's application for a refund (ECF No. 57) is denied. A copy of this Order is being mailed by Chambers staff to Petitioner. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 12/3/2020) (kv)
December 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 36 ORDER: Following the Second Circuit's Summary Order in this matter (See ECF No. 34), this Court directs both parties to file supplemental briefing to address the merits of Petitioner Robert Camarano's 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas petition. This Court fixes the following schedule: 1. Petitioner shall file any supplemental briefing by January 31, 2020. 2. Respondent shall file any opposition papers by February 28, 2020. 3. Petitioner shall file any reply by March 20, 2020. The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and note service on the docket. ( Brief due by 1/31/2020., Reply to Response to Brief due by 3/20/2020., Responses to Brief due by 2/28/2020) (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 12/11/2019) (mro) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
September 19, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 29 OPINION & ORDER: Petitioner pro se Robert Camarano seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his convictions for second-degree murder and third-degree criminal mischief. Camarano alleges that the delay in perfecting his a ppeal is attributable to the ineffective assistance of his appellate attorneys and amounts to a denial of due process. Camarano's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is denied because he has failed to exhaust his cla ims in state court. Further, Camarano has not shown that any alleged errors by the trial court or his counsel cannot be addressed through the state appellate process. Because Camarano has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitution al right, a certificate of appealability will not be issued. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). In addition, this Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438 (1962). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the petition pending at ECF No. 1, and mark this case as closed. The Clerk of Court is further directed to mail a copy of this order to Petitioner and note service on the docket. (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 9/19/2017) (jwh)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Camarano v. Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Robert Camarano
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T. Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?