Li v. Shanahan et al
| Bi Yu Li |
| Christopher Shanahan and Orange County Correctional Facility |
| 1:2016cv02351 |
| March 30, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Albany |
| Paul A. Engelmayer |
| Barbara C. Moses |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
OPINION AND ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendation granting re: 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Christopher Shanahan. Careful review of the thorough and well-reasoned Report reveals that there is no facial error in its co nclusion, and, indeed, that it is clearly correct. The parties' failure to file written objections precludes appellate review of this decision. See Caidor v. Onondaga County, 517 F.3d 601, 604(2d Cir. 2008); Small v. Sec'y of Health & Hum an Servs., 892 F.2d 15, 16 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam). Indeed, the Report specifically states that "failure to file timely objections will preclude appellate review." Report at 6. The Report, which is incorporated by reference herein, is therefore adopted without modification. Respondents' motion to dismiss the petition for habeas corpus is granted. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (As further set forth in this Opinion and Order.) (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 12/5/2016) (mro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
