In Re: Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC |
Securities Investor Protection Corporation and Irving H. Picard |
Russell L. Dusek |
1:2016cv02806 |
April 14, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Foley Square Office |
New York |
William H Pauley |
Bankruptcy Appeal (801) |
28 U.S.C. § 0158 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated July 15, 2016, Appellants' motion for leave to file an interlocutory appeal is denied and Respondents' motion for sanctions is also denied; accordingly, 16-cv2792, 16-cv2804, 16-cv2806, and 16-cv-2807 are closed. (Signed by Clerk of Court Ruby Krajick on 7/15/2016) (Attachments: #1 Notice of Right to Appeal, #2 Notice of Right to Appeal)(dt) |
Filing 14 OPINION & ORDER re: (4 in 1:16-cv-02792-WHP) MOTION for Leave to Appeal filed by Russell L. Dusek, Carol Nelson, Russell Oasis, RAR Entrepreneurial Fund, LTD., Stanley Nelson, (4 in 1:16-cv-02804-WHP) MOTION for Leave to Appeal filed by Carol Nelson, Stanley Nelson, (4 in 1:16-cv-02807-WHP) MOTION for Leave to Appeal filed by Carol Nelson, (4 in 1:16-cv-02806-WHP) MOTION for Leave to Appeal filed by Russell L. Dusek. Appellants' motion for leave to file an interlocutory appeal is denied. Respondents' motion for sanctions is also denied. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate all motions pending in cases numbered 16-cv-2792, 16-cv-2804, 16-cv-2806, and 16-cv-2807, and mark each of these cases as closed. (As further set forth in this Opinion & Order.) (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 7/14/2016) (mro) |
Transmission to Judgments and Orders Clerk. Transmitted re: #14 Memorandum & Opinion,,,, to the Judgments and Orders Clerk. (mro) |
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge William H. Pauley, III: Oral Argument held on 5/12/2016. (WO) |
Filing 13 ORDER: The oral argument previously scheduled for May 12, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. is advanced on consent to May 12, 2016 at 12:00 p.m. ( Oral Argument set for 5/12/2016 at 12:00 PM before Judge William H. Pauley III.) (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 5/11/2016) (mro) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC ORDER: Upon submission of written application to this Court, it is hereby ORDERED that the following attorney(s) are authorized to bring the Personal Electronic Device(s) and/or the General Purpose Computing Device(s) (collectively, "Devices") listed below into the Courthouse for use in a proceeding or trial in the action captioned Picard v. RAR Entrepreneurial Fund, LTD, et al. The date(s) for which such authorization is provided is (are) May 12, 2016. Attorney: Anat Maytal - Device(s): FM microphone device (Phonak Zoomlink). (As further set forth in this Order.) (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 5/11/2016) (cf) |
Filing 11 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Gregory Michael Dexter on behalf of Russell L. Dusek. New Address: Chaitman, LLP, 465 Park Avenue, New York, New York, United States 10022, 8887591114. (Dexter, Gregory) |
Filing 10 ORDER: Having received the motions by RAR Entrepreneurial Fund, Ltd., Russell Oasis, Carol Nelson, Stanley Nelson, and Russell Dusek seeking leave to appeal from an order granting the Trustee's request for a protective order, the parties shall appear for oral argument on May 12, 2016 at 4:30 p.m. SO ORDERED. ( Oral Argument set for 5/12/2016 at 04:30 PM before Judge William H. Pauley III.) (Signed by Judge William H. Pauley, III on 4/26/2016) (ama) |
Filing 9 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal . Document filed by Russell L. Dusek. (Chaitman, Helen) |
Filing 8 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal. Document filed by Securities Investor Protection Corporation. (bkar) |
Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Opposition re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal. Document filed by Irving H. Picard. (bkar) |
***DELETED DOCUMENT. Deleted document number #7 Objection re: 4. The document was incorrectly filed in this case. (laq) |
CASE DECLINED AS NOT RELATED. Case referred as related to 15cv6564 and declined by Judge George B. Daniels and returned to wheel for assignment. (wb) |
NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT to Judge William H. Pauley, III. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (wb) |
Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. Gorenstein is so designated. (wb) |
Filing 6 DECLARATION of Helen Davis Chaitman in Support re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal. Document filed by Russell L. Dusek. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L)(bkar) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support re: #4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal. Document filed by Russell L. Dusek. (bkar) |
Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Appeal Document filed by Russell L. Dusek.(bkar) |
Filing 3 STATEMENT OF RELATEDNESS re: that this action be filed as related to 15-cv-6564. Document filed by Russell L. Dusek.(bkar) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (bkar) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF APPEAL FROM THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO THE S.D.N.Y. from the Order of Judge Stuart M. Bernstein dated March 17, 2016. Bankruptcy Court Case Numbers: 10-4644A, 08-1789A (SMB). Certified copies of file received.Document filed by Russell L. Dusek.(bkar) |
Case Designated ECF. (bkar) |
BANKRUPTCY APPEAL CASE REFERRED BY ATTORNEY TO Judge George B. Daniels as possibly related to 15-cv-6564. (bkar) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.